Why most event brainstorms fail

You know the ritual. Eight people at a table, sticky notes, a flip chart, someone says 'there are no wrong ideas'. Two hours later the wall is covered in coloured notes and everyone goes home with the feeling: we did something. The week after, nobody remembers what was come up with. This is what creative brainstorming for an event too often looks like.

Most brainstorms fail because they start without direction. People come up with loose things (a magician, an escape room, an act from years ago), without anyone asking the question of what they're working towards.

A good brainstorm doesn't start with ideas, but with a question sharp enough to be able to say 'no'. 'What could we do at our staff party?' isn't a question. 'How do we celebrate having a grip on things again after two tough years, without it feeling like a victory party?' That's a question that prompts answers that mean something.

Start with the question, not the format

The most important step in a brainstorm happens before the brainstorm. Formulate the question. Write it down. Test it with four or five people. If everyone immediately says 'clear', it isn't sharp enough. A good brainstorm question invites different interpretations.

Good questions always contain the moment (why now?) and the feeling you want to evoke. Just as important: what it must not become. 'How do we turn our strategy week into something people talk about on Monday morning, without it feeling like forced enthusiasm?' That's a question that gives direction without forcing an answer.

Never start with the format: so not with 'we want a festival' or 'we want a gala'. The format is the end point, not the starting point. Start with the format, and you end up with a copy of last year's event.

Who's at the table?

A brainstorm with only the leadership team produces leadership ideas, a brainstorm with only marketing produces marketing ideas. A brainstorm with three to six people from different levels and disciplines produces the best ideas. Provided one person leads the conversation.

Choose people who like to think out loud, who dare to push back and who know the company. Not necessarily the most creative people on paper. Often it's people from operations, reception or customer service who bring the sharpest input. They hear what really matters.

The person leading the session isn't a participant. They ask questions, summarise and make sure there's silence when it's needed. Taking part and leading at the same time doesn't work. If you don't have an external facilitator, then appoint one person who explicitly takes on the role.

Working in three rounds, not in chaos

The biggest misconception: a brainstorm is chaotic. A good brainstorm is, in fact, tightly structured. We work in rounds of 25 minutes, with breaks in between to let the brain settle.

Start divergent. Anything goes. Goal: as many associations, stories, images and memories as possible. No judgement, no discussion, just gathering. This is often where the most honest things surface, things people don't normally say in a meeting.

After that it becomes thematic. You group the output into clusters, not by format (workshops, acts, food) but by feeling. Which clusters generate energy and which feel old?

In the final round, you choose the clusters with the most energy and push them further. What's sharpest, what doesn't work and what's still missing? Only here does the format come into view, and it points itself out if you've done the earlier rounds well.

The selection: how you go from twelve ideas to one concept

After the brainstorm you don't have a concept. You have raw material. The hardest part begins now: choosing. Choosing is painful, because every good idea you don't choose disappoints someone. But a concept that wants to be everything becomes nothing.

Use filters to choose. Does this fit who we really are? An idea that gives energy but doesn't fit won't work. Does this solve the problem the brainstorm question was about? An idea that's fun but doesn't touch the feeling belongs in the next brainstorm, not this one. Is this also feasible? A concept that only works on paper is an art project, not an event.

After a brainstorm we always write out a single side of A4: the title, the core idea, the feeling and the three most important moments. If that one-pager reads convincingly, we have a concept. If it feels like a summary of loose ideas, we have to go back to the question.

Why a brainstorm with your agency works

Brainstorming internally has a drawback: everyone knows each other too well. The assumptions that already live in the company stay invisible. Someone who has never worked with you sees things that have become invisible to you.

We're an agency that both devises concepts and delivers them. That means our brainstorms run differently from those of a purely creative team. We factor in feasibility from the start. An idea that isn't technically possible gets an alternative from us that evokes the same feeling and can actually be built. That stops you hitting a wall three weeks later.

A brainstorm with Live Impact lasts two to three hours as standard, with one facilitator and one concept developer. Beforehand, we gather input through short conversations with a few people from your organisation. Afterwards, we deliver a concept A4 within five working days, with direction, core idea and first visual. You then decide whether you want to build further or want another round to sharpen the direction.

Getting beyond loose ideas

A good brainstorm doesn't give you a list of ideas. It gives you and your team the feeling that you know which way you want to go. That's not a creative trick, it's a method.

We facilitate brainstorm sessions as part of a concept process or as a standalone service if you only want to sharpen the direction. The outcome isn't a wall full of sticky notes, but a clear starting point for what you build.

Call us on 085 401 40 14 or send an email to hello@live-impact.nl.

Seriously fun.

Frequently asked questions

How do you run an effective brainstorm session?

An effective brainstorm lasts 2-4 hours. Start with a warm-up (15 min, energy) and the problem statement (10 min, clarity). After that come idea generation (30 min, no criticism), clustering (20 min, themes) and refinement (30 min, top 3). Provide facilitation, visual support and energy management. Split groups of more than 20 people into subgroups. Post-its, whiteboards and music help. Live Impact facilitates or coaches sessions for maximum output.

Want to know more? Read our full article →

What are the rules for a successful brainstorm?

The golden rule: everything may be said, nothing is judged. Anyone who shoots an idea down before it's been thought through kills the creativity.

Beyond that, make sure there is a neutral facilitator who guards the energy. Set a clear time limit per round and alternate individual thinking with group discussion. Anonymous input via brainwriting helps in teams where hierarchy plays a role. Always close with selection and a concrete next step. Live Impact guides creative sessions with proven formats.

Want to know more? Read our full article →

How do you facilitate inclusion in brainstorming?

Inclusive brainstorms require active facilitation. Quiet people get talked over, dominant voices drown others out, and hierarchy stifles good ideas. Start with explicit conversation rules: no one is interrupted, no idea is judged straight away. Work with a time-keeper who watches speaking time. A maximum of 60 seconds per person per round. Use a turn-rotation method: everyone briefly gives an idea, not just whoever shouts loudest. For shyness or language differences, 5 minutes of writing ideas individually on cards (anonymously) works well. Stick them on a wall, read them aloud without a name. That way every voice gets equal room. Take language choice into account: in an international team, choose Dutch or English and stay consistent. Avoid in-jokes and jargon that excludes newcomers. Let the most senior person speak last, otherwise others automatically follow. Give explicit recognition to ideas from people who are normally quiet. Live Impact facilitates brainstorms in which every voice carries equal weight.

Which tools and techniques help with brainstorming?

Effective tools for brainstorming are structured methods like brainwriting, De Bono's Six Thinking Hats and SCAMPER. With brainwriting, everyone writes ideas down without speaking. Digitally, Miro and Mural work well as visual whiteboards. For live sessions, post-its and large sheets of paper are still the most accessible.

We always recommend starting with individual thinking before bringing the group together, so group pressure doesn't influence the outcome.

How do you evaluate and implement brainstorm ideas?

The value of a brainstorm sits in the follow-up, not in the session itself. Start clustering immediately after the session: group ideas by theme in 30 minutes. Avoid content discussion during clustering. That comes later. Use an impact-effort matrix to prioritise: high impact + low effort goes first. Mark every remaining idea with an owner and a deadline. No owner means no action. Define 5 ideas to execute within 30 days, 5 within 60 days and 5 within 90 days. The rest go on the waiting list: not for now, but kept for later. Schedule a check-in after 30 days to discuss progress. Fail openly: an idea that doesn't work, you cross out explicitly, otherwise it lingers as debt. Communicate back to participants which ideas are alive and which aren't. People who hear nothing back won't join the next session. Live Impact guides brainstorms including the implementation track afterwards.

Inspired
Moved?

Thank you!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.