You organise a symposium for a fundamentally different reason than a conference. A conference covers a broad theme for a large, mixed audience. A symposium is something else: a focused gathering for people who already know what it's about.
You invite subject specialists, researchers, policymakers and practitioners. People who know the subject, work with it day to day and have something to say about it. The aim is depth, not breadth.
That calls for a different approach. Less production, more content. Less entertainment, more dialogue. A symposium doesn't have a big entertainment programme or a chair whose job it is to keep everyone fired up. What it does have: sharp speakers, a tight schedule and enough room for questions and discussion.
Symposiums are organised by professional bodies, knowledge centres, universities and companies that want to position themselves as an authority in their field. The audience is small — 30 to 150 attendees is typical. And that's the strength. People in a smaller group talk differently. They're more honest and more direct. And more willing to say something they wouldn't say in a big hall.
Typical of a symposium: a half day or a full day around one central theme. Two to four speakers, a panel discussion and enough time for questions. No big show, no confetti. But content attendees take away.
The difference with a conference? At a conference you can sit through two hours and miss nothing that mattered to you. At a symposium, every presentation is relevant to everyone in the room. That's the definition. More on organising a conference →
